Home › Opinion & Editorial › Guest Columns
Guest commentary: DUI checkpoints are expensive — and ineffective
More Guest Columns
- Guest commentary: Here comes the sun
- Guest Commentary: Project Innovation: Moving toward economic sustainability
- Guest Commentary: Substance-abuse survey should be wake-up call for parents
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
Labor Day, as the name suggests, celebrates our country’s labor force. Over the holiday weekend, millions of hard-working Americans will take that theme to heart by doing … well, as little work as possible. But many others — including police officers nationwide — will still be on the job, working tirelessly to ensure the safety of our extended weekend and roadways.
Fortunately, evidence shows that there are simple ways our law enforcement can catch a little break too.
Efficiency in the U.S. labor force is at an all-time high. Compared to the 1950s, today’s average employee logs 5 percent fewer hours at work. Over that same period, productivity has increased. This means Americans are spending less time at work to produce more than earlier generations.
But that efficiency has yet to translate to a certain enforcement tactic to fight drunk driving.
Over the Labor Day weekend, Florida will assign hundreds of officers to run sobriety checkpoints. Officers spend hours screening hundreds, sometimes thousands, of vehicles that pass through a previously announced location. These roadblocks demand extensive funding and considerable man-hours, but yield precious few drunk-driving arrests.
With our slowing economy and rising gas prices, resources are tight and getting tighter. That reality makes the $29 million in federal funds earmarked to help run these pricey checkpoints in 2009 a luxury we can’t afford. With overtime for a dozen or more officers, the costs of everyone’s travel delays and the value of other materials and equipment, the average checkpoint costs about $8,800.
In 2006, states that relied on checkpoints averaged 7 percent more alcohol-related fatalities than those that used other tactics. The reason for that discrepancy is readily apparent when considering programs like South Dakota’s, where officers ran more than 300 checkpoints in 2006. Even though the overtime alone cost taxpayers $177,000, the roadblocks, on average, only yielded a single arrest.
Checkpoints in Ohio, Kansas, New York and other states from coast to coast had similar results. These examples aren’t unique, and supporters often scramble to defend the low numbers. They claim checkpoints raise “awareness” of enforcement efforts, reducing the tactic to little more than an overpriced publicity stunt.
The alternative is saturation patrols. They’re both less expensive and more effective.
Rather than placing a group of officers at a single location to wait for drunks to come to them, these roving patrols utilize one or two police officers to cruise the roadways in search of all types of dangerous drivers. A typical patrol runs about $300 — as compared to the roadblock’s $8,000. And that bargain price even comes with a guarantee. An FBI analysis determined: “It is proven that saturation efforts will bring more DUI arrests than sobriety checkpoints.”
At a fraction of the cost, saturation patrols are 11 times more effective than high-dollar checkpoints at removing drunk drivers from our streets. It only takes a simple cost-benefit analysis to understand their superiority: less manpower, smaller price tag, better results.
Labor Day is a great opportunity for the public to think about American workers. So drive responsibly this weekend and be thankful for the hard-working men and women who are spending the holiday helping you get home safe. And remember, sometimes the best way to honor their service is to help them be more effective.
It’s time for Florida to do away with wasteful roadblocks — for their sake and ours.
Sarah Longwell is the managing director of the American Beverage Institute in Washington, D.C., an association of restaurants committed to the responsible serving of adult beverages.








Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
The Truth about DUI... The slogan.. Drunk Driving, Over the Limit, Under Arrest. This suggests that there is some level to drinking in which you are safe to be behind the wheel of your car and on the road. It is misleading. The fact... If you have had just one drink and you are pulled over for any reason, or if you are pointed out at a check point. When the officer smells alcohol. You will be asked to perform Field Sobriety Tests a formality and an attempt to gather evidence against you. You will be handcuffed and placed in a police vehicle for a trip; taken to the station that BAC (breathalyzer tests are performed). If and when you blow even if you blow a 00.02 BAC well below the legal limit you are already under arrest. How did you get to the police station? Your car has been impounded. You will spend time in jail. You will be charged with DUI, you will have to defend yourself in court. You will ask, yes i have been charged with this offense. I take responsibility for myself and i give the rest of you who have much to loose fair warning. Noone deserves to die in an alcohol related accident, noone deserves to die in any accident but this is the one the government and police have focused their efforts on. It is terrible when someone looses someone this way, and the people who are proven to be the cause of an alcohol related fatality deserve what they get. The Law is vague and misleading and there are many good people who are charged with this offense that believe they are doing the right thing and obeying the Law because of the way it is written. Please do not Drink and drive after any amount of alcohol. (Truth)
#1 Posted by BruceMiami on August 29, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This article is pure rhetoric by the alcoholic beverage industry. It is an attempt to block enforcement, just as wireless companies have effectively blocked laws prohibiting driving and using hand-held cell phones. And people are dying because of successful industry lobbying.
#2 Posted by Bramble on August 30, 2008 at 7:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)