Home › Bonita › Bonita
Teen drivers at risk: Report calls for higher age requirement
Related Links
- Special section: Get more traffic news in our special section
- Read Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's report on accident rates among teens (.pdf)
More Bonita
- Passenger traffic down again during October at SWFIA
- Long-time Lee activist Brian Griffin dies at 68
- Lee commissioners will continue to pay law firm to lobby on their behalf
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
BONITA SPRINGS Jessica Morehead is in a hurry as she fills her tank at the Amerifuel gas station on U.S. 41, just south of Corkscrew Road in Estero.
She is running late for an athletic event at South Fort Myers High School.
“I am involved in five sports at one time,” says the Estero High senior. “I definitely need to drive.”
Morehead has been driving for two years, but if a national auto safety group has its way, many teens will have to rely on their parents to handle a busy schedule like hers.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently released a report calling on states to increase the driving age from 16 to 17.
The report studies accident rates among teens in states including New Jersey, the only state where the required age is 17.
“We have looked at 16-year-olds, 17-year-olds and 18-year-olds with brand new driver’s licenses,” said Anne Fleming, an IIHS spokeswoman. “With the same experience, 16-year-olds have the higher crash rates.”
Nationally, more than 5,000 teens die each year in car crashes and the rate of all crashes for 16-year-olds is 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, measured by per mile driven.
“As a state we lose the majority of our kids to driving, “ said Deb Ogden, driver education coordinator for the Collier County School System. “Vehicular accidents is the leader in our children’s death in the state. The best way to get a child trained for driving is through a school-based program. That way, they can get education at school and they can also work with their parents.”
Not everyone agrees that raising the age requirement is a solution.
“I don’t think it has to do with age,” said Morehead. “There are people who are 25 who don’t know what they’re doing on the road.”
Bill Knox of A Aardvark Driving School in Bonita Springs says safe driving is more about education, parental supervision, and on-the-road experience than it is about age.
“Teens make mistakes like anyone else, but they need experience driving,” said Knox.
“The difference comes from the home; if their parents teach them, ride with them and puts restrictions on them like taking away the cell phones when they drive, they do OK.
“But No. 1, young people have a right to drive. They need to work and they need transportation to do it.”
In Florida, drivers aged 15 to 19 have the highest rate of involvement in crashes (43.9 of 1,000 drivers in 2007) and the highest rate of driver fatalities (5.1 in 1,000 drivers) of any age group, according to the Florida Department of Motor Vehicles.
Those rates are roughly half the crash rates of Florida drivers 30 to 34.
Florida teen accident numbers peak at the ages of 18 and 19, but Fleming says that reflects the state’s strong graduated licensing system, which includes teen learner’s permits, restricted driving periods and 50 hours experience driving with an adult over 21.
Sixteen and 17-year-olds are wrecking less than the older kids because they are driving with their parents, she said.
“We have done a detailed evaluation of Florida licensing law and it’s been excellent, with very clear benefits,” said Fleming. “But what we find is raising the age to 17 plus putting in the graduated licensing provisions is the best you can do.”
According to Courtney Heidelberg, spokeswoman for FDMV, teen crash rates dropped by 23 percent when graduated licensing was adopted in 1996.
“We stand by our laws and believe they work,” said Heidelberg. “Experience will improve driving skills and reducing the distractions increases attention to the road. The key is starting good habits at an early age.”
Linda Dundee of Southwest Florida Safety Council Inc. said high teenage crash rates are enough for her to support raising the age requirements.
The driving school teaches about 1,500 Southwest Florida teens to drive each year.
“There is a wide variety of maturity at the younger age,” she said. “Some take driving quite seriously and some treat it like a joke. “
In Collier County, students can take driver’s education from teachers who are certified by the state and are DMN examiners. The teachers can give both the written and road examinations. The class last for a semester and students work in both written simulators and time behind the wheel which is 30 percent of their time.
But it’s been proven that states with the higher age requirement have less fatalities, so if you’re trying to save lives — and we are — you’ve got to see raising the age as a good thing.”
Ryan Nicotra, 16, acknowledges that maturity is a factor with some kids his age but says he needs a license.
Nicotra, who was collecting job applications at Coconut Point mall on Thursday, currently holds a learner’s permit but wants a regular driver’s license so he can work and drive to school.
“We do get a lot of information about safety at school,” he said. “They do a lot of presentations — some people take it seriously, some people don’t.
“But when you’re 15 and get your permit, it would be a real disappointment if they raised the age. I think by junior year, most kids shouldn’t be riding the bus.”








Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Personally I think it should be raised to 18
#1 Posted by sunburnt on October 12, 2008 at 8:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Don't forget to take they're cell phones away also when they are driving. The law should not allow people to drive and talk on the phone at the same time but lets at least start with the kids.
#2 Posted by fishman on October 12, 2008 at 9:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The government should not be able to tell people not to use thier cell phones in a car. It should be a common sense decision. Keep the government out of our lives! SAY NO TO SOCIALISM
#3 Posted by reality101 on October 12, 2008 at 11:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again, government want to write laws to punish everyone for the stupidity of a few.
What about the kid who doesn't use his cell phone, and has a better reaction rate and vision than most of the local citizens?
Parents need to be at the forefront.
#4 Posted by volochine on October 13, 2008 at 1:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Where are all these little young people getting these vehicles to get killed or have accidents in? Got the license at sixteen, 1953, rented vehicle for test, my money. Drove my first real vehicles in 1955, all military stuff, including Tanks, overseas. 1956, 57, A Nash , A Buick, A 49 Ford, bought them all myself, learned about and bought insurance with the first vehicle, the Nash. Didn't need no parents babysitting me, I had 2 tons of steel, that was my responsibilities. Don't pass the buck to my parents, I was racing, legally in Kansas, in 1956, did not have to call Mommy and Daddy. What can I tell you, treat a child like a child, they will drive, like a child, Oh, MAKE SURE YOU BUY FOR THEM AND PAY FOR IT, A CELL PHONE!!!!!! Then tell the law about their sad accidents.
#5 Posted by rayroman on October 13, 2008 at 4:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Raising the driving age means more driving for parents who just don't have the time.
Why not try more driver education first?
#6 Posted by Bramble on October 13, 2008 at 4:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Michigan changed their laws to some of the toughest in the country several years ago after their teen driver death rate climbed dramatically.
In Michigan, you can still get a driver license at 16, but you can only drive with a licensed parent or legal guardian until you're 18. At 18, you can drive by yourself, but if you get into an accident that is your fault or get a moving violation of 3 points or more, you go back to having to drive with a licensed parent or guardian until you're 21. And, at any time after getting your license at 16, if you get a DUI, you lose your license until you're 21.
Kinda on the tough side, but I see some validity in what they're trying to do.
#7 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 13, 2008 at 5:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #6 - It doesn't necessarily mean parents would have to drive more. It would just mean that teens would have to get a little more creative about how they get around. Walking is always a viable option, as is riding a bike. Or, if it's too far to do either one of those, there is plenty of good, reliable public transportation in Lee and Collier Counties.
Driving is not a "right", as is mentioned in the article. It is a priviledge. And, the second teens forget that (or the second parents let them forget it), is when the problems begin.
#8 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 13, 2008 at 5:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Something we saw in England last year I thought was good. For the first year after getting a license, the driver's car had a license plate had a big "L" for "Learner" on it. As we understood it, this was regardless of age.
#9 Posted by pauls on October 13, 2008 at 7:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here is an interesting stat;
According to American Family Insurance the most accident claims are;
#1 Driver under 25 driving over 65 mph
#2 Driver over 65 driving under 25 mph
#10 Posted by Optipess on October 13, 2008 at 7:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #11 - That is interesting.
I've been a proponent for a long time that once you reach age 65, a driver license must be renewed at a minimum every other year (to include vision and hearing tests), rather than the standard length of time for younger drivers.
Conversely, I've also been a proponent of raising the minimum driving age and requiring more time as a "probationary" driver before getting a permanent license, as well.
#11 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 13, 2008 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If we raise the age requirement for a drivers license, then we should, also, mandate eye exams and driver's testing for anyone over 70 years of age. Test them every 4 years. Our roads would be much safer as a result... take it from this driver who helplessly watched a woman in her 80's, her head just barely above the steering wheel, back right into my car at Publix while I stood their with my grocery cart yelling at her to stop. After she hit my car, she tried to drive off as if nothing happened.... my car could have been a pedestrian; think about it.
#12 Posted by RunSilentRunDeep on October 13, 2008 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
WOW # 14 is a very bitter person, and comments like that scare the heck out of me. I know many very responsible teen drivers, but it is easier to punish the majority, saves time. People seem to forget that they were 16 once, and I am sure all adults now were perfect 16 year old drivers. Hipocracy at its best.
#13 Posted by tonywojo on October 13, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As a parent and as someone that started driving at the age of 16, i think it is too young to drive. that being said, i think there are more accidents with 16yr olds because, it is the first year of driving. if it is changed to 17, the same numbers will apply to age 17.
i see the issue of talking and texting on the phones but that is also older people as well.
i had to go to a mandatory semester of driver's ed and had to pass, in order to get my license.
#14 Posted by NeezDutz on October 13, 2008 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Leave the age at 16 but make the old people get annual DOT physicals which should include a list of medications. I see so many spaced out old people it is scary, yes it is an old argument, that is what makes it good. Less overly medicated old people driving makes our roads safer.
#15 Posted by Caliban on October 13, 2008 at 10:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I believe it's called natural selection.
Just like the slowest gazzel gets eaten by the lion...
...so the most under qualified, incapable, and distracted (cell phones) drivers will be removed from the herd.
It's the Circle of Life.
#16 Posted by naplesborn on October 13, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Cars kill people?
BAN ALL THE CARS!!
#17 Posted by Ruger on October 13, 2008 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I love that so many people forget that they were young once too. I'm 18 and I've never been involved in an accident and I've never gotten a ticket or have been pulled over. To group anyone under the age of 21 and label them as bad drivers is ignorant. I know people my age who are horrible drivers but their parents don't do anything about it. My mom told me that she would help me get a car but if I messed up it was on me and I would have to take care of it on my own. I know that some people have brought up the idea that we should walk but what about all of the young people who are killed in hit and run accidents due to drunk drivers well over the age of 21. Now, I'm sure that some of you are going to say that young people shouldn't be out late at night when drunk drivers are on the roads. My cousin was hit by a drunk driver at 10:30 in the morning. I think that the age limit should remain the same but after the driver has proven to be unfit behind the wheel that they should be taken off the road. I understand that in some cases it only takes one time to screw up, but if the consequences are more severe than I feel that EVERYONE will drive safer.
#18 Posted by utvol2248 on October 13, 2008 at 10:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hang out in a high school parking lot and see the lack of maturity behind the wheel. Speeding thru pkg lots, coming in on 2 wheels. I almost got hit by a kid pulling in on two wheels the other morning at Barron Collier.
Raise it to 18. Keep the roads safe.
#19 Posted by Nplschick on October 13, 2008 at 11:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Of course, raise the age to 18. There's at least 3 times more cars on the roads these days anyway since the 50's, 60's and 70's and less cars on the road is always good. Those school buses have plenty of space available. But to think that the kids will be safer riding bikes or walking around need to remember Florida is one of the most dangerous places in the country for bikers and pedestrians and until decent mass transit is available along with decent pathways for non-motorized travel, safety will not be maximized.
#20 Posted by wes on October 13, 2008 at 12:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree, raise it to 18.
#21 Posted by Hendry on October 13, 2008 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Whoo! grumpy Rock?
I got my license at 16, paid for my own car, helped pay for the insurance, and fixed/maintained my vehicle as necessary. I also had a job, and had to take on a second job to bust my a** through college.
You up the driving age to 18, then the accident rate for 18 year olds will go up. Like number 11 pointed out, the old people are just as dangerous ad the teenagers. I was in the Publix parking lot the other day and this old lady in her Cadillac backed out, right into my shopping cart and me and then had the gall to get out and start yelling at me for the scratches on her bumper.
#22 Posted by Spetsnaz on October 13, 2008 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just read a story on CNN about a 90 year old lady in Miami who drove her new car into a pole killing herself and almost killing her son! She thought the break pedal was the gas. I looked in the news and saw no stories of any teen drivers killing anybody today! Lets keep track.
#23 Posted by Caliban on October 13, 2008 at 4:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
P.S. Rockford you are a pathetic old person. I grew up here dealing with crumudgeons like you. Scroodge is about all I can say.
#24 Posted by Caliban on October 13, 2008 at 4:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good points.
Take a minute and think,
how many times have you had a driving problem with a teenager and how many times you had a problem with an elderly driver?
For me, in Naples, it's at least 20 to 1 elderly drivers more then kids.
#25 Posted by Optipess on October 13, 2008 at 4:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Caliban, so your standard for keeping track will be news coverage of accidents? Glad the insurance companies keep better track of stats than that. News will cover the unusual or sensational.
And for all who think "elderly" is 65 or older, I suppose you will be there to take your parents and grandparents around when they grow soooo old? LOL, like your age will never progress?
On my grandparents' farm we didn't need a license to drive...all we needed to do was to be able to reach the pedals. I was tall, so I got to drive before my older brother. ...and about that still in the back barn...LS, well better than a brewski.
(only kidding folks, no revenuers need investigate my gramps)
#26 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on October 13, 2008 at 9:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I say instead of raising the minimum they need to make a maximum. My neighbor is so old she can barely see or walk, let alone remember where she is. Yet she just got her new license in the mail.
They need to make people retake the test every so many years. Renewing a license by mail is a joke and endangers everyone.
#27 Posted by Trojanz33 on October 14, 2008 at 2:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nplschick, hang out in a church parking lot and watch all the olds ones almost try to kill themselves getting out of the parking lot for a Perkin's/IHOP/some other old-people hang-out. It is just about on par with the H.S. parking lot.
I guess then we should ban them all. Take away all driving rights. Hell, in that case maybe all licenses should be revoked and we should all just walk from point A to point B.
#28 Posted by jim09091 on October 14, 2008 at 2:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)
Note: due to high traffic to our site right now, your comment may not appear for a few minutes.