Repeat by "popular" request:

Attn Liberal/Some dems: Stick and stones!!!

Remember what makes a liberal/some dems cry, whine and complain...FACTS/truth.

Again do not let your "egos and especially emotions" interfere with your ability to reason.
Suggest you do more research into Braco's background on your own. By the way, more revelations are coming soon.

Sit back, review your facts again, sip a little more kool aide and then thank God for the epiphany!

LATEST POLL RESULTS:
42%...42% each.

The way polls work are simple. Each convention gets a bounce and then a down turn. It then attains a more serious phase which then becomes a nail biter for both sides.

The "serious phase" is right around the corner.
Grab your rosaries, kool aide or whatever and stay tuned!

Opra has to decide whether to allow Sarah on her tv show! Remember...she is the one who introduced the Chicago community organizer!

Opra is in a box. She will certainly alienate a lot of WOMEN regardless of their party affiliations!!! She can't afford to lose viewer market share or there goes her empire!!!

Grab a seat, sip more kool aide and watch as all this plays out!!!!

This is better than any script written by the hollywood liberals, who are mostly under educated and politcally inexperienced!!!

Who vetted Braco???

How did Braco's asociations/friendships with those "dubious individuals" get over looked by the various nvestigating agencies? Remember...people in Washington handle material and are envolved in top secrete situations which require a "clearance".

If Braco was a republican, the media/liberals/some dems would be clamoring for an investigation!

Regardless of your party affiliation, can we simply let this go and hope for the best? Or should we e-mail, fax, call and write our elected officals for an explanation. Your choice.

NEWS FLASH EXCLUSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!

BULLWINKLE PUBLICLY ENDORSES BARACK!!!!!!!!

A spokesperson issued the following statement.

"Oh, she may try to come across as a loving mother, but that crazy bit.ch chased me halfway across Alaska. If I hadn't hauled antlers at first sight, she'd got the drop on me. I look up, see two barrels and ti..ies staring me in the face, I thought it was all over. If it weren't for the old guy with her huffin and puffin, trying to keep up, I'd been moose meat."

The Naples Daily News used to list Blood Alcohol Content levels in the Police Beat section of the newspaper, but they stopped many years ago. Maybe people started to consider it a competition?

Have you ever really wondered how a roadside sobriety test measures up to a BAC? It would be interesting to get a variety of people and see how the tests compare... maybe on the Government channel to show people the foolishness of driving impaired and thinking you're more sober than you are?

Can you believe that Anne Marie Gressani was "slumming" and watched the Democratic convention? Heresy! I'm disappointed she neglected to invoke God to bless America at the end of her "piece". How uncharicteristic of a conservative Republican hypocrite, especially her. That's her "trademark" cover.

She still knows "quality" when she sees it though. Making sure to note that "Silent Sarah" (no media interviews until she passes the RNC Deceptive Rhetorical Course.) is a LIFE TIME member of the NRA. That's really "shooting off her mouth"! Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

Obamas called 'uppity'

By BEN EVANS

Barack and Michelle Obama. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Republican congressman from Georgia who referred to Barack and Michelle Obama as “uppity” says he wasn’t aware of the term’s racial overtones and did not intend to insult anyone.

Speaking to reporters Thursday, Rep. Lynn Westmoreland of Grantville, Ga., described the Obamas as members of an “elitist-class ... that thinks that they’re uppity,” according to The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper.

Asked if he intended to use the word, he said, “Yeah, uppity.”

In a statement Friday, Westmoreland — who was born in 1950 and raised in the segregated South — said he didn’t know that “uppity” was commonly used as a derogatory term for blacks seeking equal treatment. Instead, he referred to the dictionary definition of the word as describing someone who is haughty, snobbish or has inflated self-esteem.

“He stands by that characterization and thinks it accurately describes the Democratic nominee,” said Brian Robinson, Westmoreland’s spokesman. “He was unaware that the word had racial overtones, and he had absolutely no intention of using a word that can be considered offensive.”

The Obama campaign had no immediate response.

Westmoreland is one of the most conservative members of Congress. He has drawn criticism from civil rights advocates on a number of issues, including last year when he led opposition to renewing the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also was one of two House members last year who opposed giving the Justice Department more money to crack unsolved civil rights killings.


from Canoe.ca Sept 5/08

Russia forming an alliance with Iran is a good thing because cooler heads in Russia will prevail and they will be able to control the hotheads...there is no way Russia will allow the Iranians to use any nuclear weapons they may amass...if indeed they will allow them to have nuclear capabilities

Russia is fully aware the results of a nuclear attack and their alliance is only to offet the US establishing missles in Poland

Latest Electoral College Polls from WDCA:

McCain 224
Obama 301
Ties 13

Today we learn that Sarah Palin received her bachelor's degree in journalism after transferring five times in six years: Hawaii Pacific University, North Idaho College, University of Idaho, Matanuska-Susitna College, University of Idaho again.

Bring back Mitt Romney (Harvard Law & Business School)

Please DON'T!!!!!!!!!!! Mitt is happy where he is at.

And Sarah was a genius pick by mini me. She has captured America's imagination.

How much harder could it be for her to command 1.3 million soldiers based at hot spots around the world than it was the MooseJaw PTA and Alaska National Guard?

Suzie, the treasure at the local PTA remembers "the BARRACUDA running that mob with an iron fist. She struck terror into the other mothers hearts. That Putin guy better look out. He knows better than to cross the Bering Strait since Sarah took over as Governor. Just like the lower 48 and 9/11, we haven't had any attacks either since Sarah was sworn in."

I wonder what our traditional long term allies think about the election this week?

The introduction of the drunken snowmobile racer/fisherman (unemployed) that in international circles insists upon being called "THE FIRST DUDE" must leave them incredulous.

Steeped in tradition and culture, the laughter from Brussels to Berlin must be uproarious.

Until they think of the security ramifications when mini me drops, if he even makes it to the election.

It's unbelievable that party loyalty trumps concern for our nation's economy, security, international reputation, constitutional rights of citizens, religious tolerance, voting rights, American citizens torturing "suspected terrorists," preemptive war against nations with no army or air force, preemptive arrests of American citizens organizing to express opposition political opinions, "free speech" zones at national conventions and presidential appearances, true support for our troops and veterans, tax inequities, the death throes of public education, and the dumping of federal responsibilities onto local communities, the government refusal to honor national commitment to reconstruct New Orleans and strengthen the levees (to international standards practiced by England and Netherlands), government secrecy. But I've got to believe it. Our town is populated with yellow dog Republicans.

Our local supporters of the status quo are enjoying life as it is and seem unable to understand issues beyond face, gender identity, and political cheerleading. The attitude seems to be, along with the unhurried drivers, "We're already here in Paradise, just where we were trying to get to all our lives. The way things are is just fine." Now Mr. McCain claims the catch word Change for his own!

Yellow dog Republicans would vote for a nearly dead yellow dog over any Democrat. Our presidential choice is between a refined, well-educated professor at a top university and a coarse man at the bottom of his Annapolis class.

Apply the same litmus test to the spouses and to the VP candidates. What matter who speaks?

I think it matters. Our nation's number one leader must be someone with at least sufficient rhetorical skills to deflect international criticism about our President not being able to speak or write in complete sentences. At best, s/he should be someone who can conduct a real press conference--one without picking _who_ can ask _what questions_ in advance, someone who doesn't behave like an ill-bred bumpkin at international summits.

Everyone should read _The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America_ before the first week in November. But few read anything anymore. We let Rupert Murdoch determine our world view.

On the bread and butter issues, the hard core matters like national security and government transparency, we supporters of Mr. Obama expect you supporters of Mr. McCain to tell us the truth. As a former teacher now a doctoral student up north writes: most of us are too busy to get to the bottom of important disputed facts – too busy wondering how we are going to pay our mortgages to contemplate the peculiar ironies of convention speakers like Rudy Giuliani shading the truth about national security or using fatuous oratory to accuse an articulate opponent of being full of hot air (Dr. Richard Herder).

The vocal Neapolitan Republicans who have written these letters to the Editor seem to be anti-egghead and don't want to think or argue rationally about anything important. Maybe I should use the phrase "Green Dog," so that local flag-wavers don't misunderstand and associate "yellow" with accusing their hero of cowardice.

In today's letters, Nick Hale "exudes" the praise of Sarah Palin and her "record" of "fighting" corruption in Alaska with her "executive abilities". What a LARK! She just as well might have been "cleaning out" her own closet at home as that CORRUPTION was the GOP establishment in a state of less than a million voters.

Now Nicky Hale thinks that Sarah can go to Washington D.C. and "clean out" 8 years of more accumulated GOP failures. True, she can probably recognize her "own" Republican rubbish gained by the experience of "first hand" relationships with her GOP "in crowd". "It takes one to know one".

The irony is that the GOP, in both instances, is proclaiming some sort of "redemption" within their own party as if GOP policies are any different because of geography, and the voter should not be aware of the BASIC underlining trend evidenced in their corruption and failures of the past.

BUSH/CHENEY = McCAIN/PALIN, there is no DIFFERENCE!

In a stump speech yesterday Sarah boosted that her son attended high school in Michigan. What's that all about? Doesn't Alaska have it's own high schools?
Track signed up for the National Guard? Why the National Guard??

Mommy is the commander.

Hoping to get into the Alaskan Naval Academy.

LOL.

It is so easy to verify information on the internet.The republicans blindly take everything their candidates say as truth.Sarah Palin's speech was full of lies about herself and about Barak Obama. People should read the truth about her and not just be swayed by her delivery of one speech.Barak has more class in his little finger than she has in her whole body, and if Jesus was alive today he would undoubtedly be a Democrat.

Quote:
From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.

oldtimer post #158...9/5/08

are we talking apples and oranges oldtimer

the 110th congress period is 1/07 to 12/08
Rejoice said Obama missed more votes than McCain

I post statistics that say McCain has missed 374 votes and Obama 263 votes in the 110th congress

what has the above statement to do with that and if there are only 143 Senate days..is that not the same for McCain???

please inform me if I am wrong as I am always willing to learn

BTW...are you and Rejoice joined at the hip?? you seem to answer an awful lot for him

Where are the economic know-it-all 'trickle down- supply siders'? Tag is gone- Fien is gone- Fish is gone- only a few neocon dolts on this forum now- not much fun.

Robbins Winslow - ammendments 5, 7 and 9 have been deemed unconstitutionsl and will not be on the ballot this Nov. Keep your eyes and ears open, though, as they will likely be dressed up in some other sort of sheeps clothing for future proposal.

Sorry - unconstitutional.

jimboaw #31....

The video is perfect. Exposes neocon hypocricy beautifully.

Thanks for the laugh!!!!!

there is absolutely no reason any qualified woman could not be on any Presidential ticket and in fact too few have reached that level

the problem for the Republicans is that Sarah Palin has come out of the clear blue sky...was not on any pundit's radar...was not known outside of Alaska and seem to have been chosen with very little background checking

unfortunately she is carrying much more "baggage" than anybody bargained for and if she was chosen to "pick up the Hillary vote" it appears she may have alienated a good portion of these woman with her very strong anti abortion stand and the fact her strong evangelical moral stand did not prevent the unwanted pregnacy of her 17 year old daughter

then there is her autocratic ..and some say ruthless....... rule of her underlings...anyone who does not agree with her finds themselves out of a job.....troopergate...accusations of abuse of power.....just an awful lot for a vice presidential candidate to shoulder nduring a combative campaign

that being said we still do not know her..there is no info on her knowledge of anything outside of Alaska..let alone anything about world affairs...what about Iran...what about Russia....etc etc etc

she performed well when handled with kid gloves and shortly we will see her perform with the press she seemed to go out of her way to alienate...which was a mistake...her first will be carefully orchestrated with sympathetic journalists with "softball" questions but we will best get to know her when she is caught off guard and impromtu press jams

the optics of the presidential slate looks good for the US and is an indication of how anyone can aspire to the highest offices

the "dirty politics" of this campaign however does not look good

#39
It is recommended that one hits "suggest removal."

Lets see if it works.

LOL.

InquisiteJS....there you go spreading falsehoods again.....no one here has the authority to have anyone banned...The NDN staff are the ones who review the "suggest remove" buttons and decide on the lack of merit of the post to remove

quite trying to alibi for your distastful remarks that got you banned as Jagged Soldier

and how do you know the aboved named are banned???

Repeat by "popular" request.

What the neocons don't want you to see.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/ind...

Oh oh.

Larry Flynt just announced he purchased what he calls the "golden bee bee" sex video for one million dollars.

Hmmmmm.

We have some people that post here that think Barry is qualified, don't we???

Or are they people with Bush Derangement Syndrome and hate everything.

Listing qualifications, achievements, accomplishments doesn't have a provision for name calling Mike. Maybe that is the reason there are no replies.

"if Jesus was alive today he would undoubtedly be a Democrat."

#26 Posted by commansense on September 6, 2008 at 8:36 a.m.

commansense - when you can't spell your own name correctly, people laugh at you. They also laugh at you when you make stupid comments.

Has everyone had a chance to see this?

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/ind...

Listing qualifications, achievements, accomplishments???

That's not playing fair Mike.

Don't forget, you are requesting people that want to be dependent on government to actually do something serious, besides name calling and LMAO and joking.

That would be like asking a liberal to leave Cedar Rapids because of flooding, without government help or money.

"How dare you critize the community organizer", yelled the women. "Just because he didn't supervise people, have a budget of billions of dollars, make daily decisions regarding the welfare (all aspects)of a state, directed the national guard in times of emergy, put out political fires daily, see people, listen to complaints/act on them, and on and on".

"How dare you indeed!" was my response!

Let's be honest/fair. There is no comparison. But both are jobs admirable in their own right.

But common sense and reality says:
1st step mayor of a city.
2nd step governor of a state.
3 rd vp or president of the greatest country in the world.

A logical progression, I'm sure you would agree! Each step prepares you for the next! Attaining the 3rd step is based on your judgement and experience derived from the previous two.

If you really want to see/better understand common sence and reality, compare a governor, senator and a community organizer' responsibilities! Make three columns and start writting. The results will speak for themselves.

One of the toughest things for individuals to do is get past their "ego and emotions". Common sence and reality are tough to accept.

In any event, have a great day and a better tomorrow!

I notice the loony lefties are not rolling on the floor laughing their a**es of today. Could that be because the letters and commentaries in support of the McCain/Palin ticket are pouring in? Could it be because what is written by readers of the NDN is likely representative of what is being said in local papers across the country?

Obama promised us change. Well, we're going to get it, just not in the way he intended.

I'm really getting tired of all that is being said about Palin's unmarried daughter being pregnant. Don't people have any compassion for the poor girl? There seems to be no end to the cruelty that politics engenders in people. I had two neices that were pregnant before marriage. My sister taught them against it, but those things happen. Why don't we leave those family matters out of the public arena?

I'm really sick of politics. Any thing that people can dig up to discredit a candidate's chances of winning will be done.

I knew who I wanted to vote for months ago. I doubt that there is much that can be said that will change my mind. I will vote for the person who I think is most in line with the way I think about the economy and social issues.

If a person has a brain to think with and is not intolerant and not greedy, should be able to think things out for themselves.

Some of you more vocal bloggers make me sick. There is too much disharmoney in this world. There is too much hate and self grandiosity.

Re #57 Perseauk: I take it that if you had a choice of living in "marxist" Chicago or "muslim" Baghdad, it would have to be the latter, because of the "low death rate and level of violence". We "know" that the Bush "lackey" Petraus has "everything" under control. It's really time for more of you conservative Republicans to spread your "gospel" out of the green zone in Baghdad and show the true "fruits of the Bush doctrine" of "oil = peace and "prosperity". Maybe a few more "shots" of Bush visiting a school to read fairytales to little Arabs will get the message across like after 9/11.

LET'S PLAY FAIR, PEOPLE:
Polls: I get a real kick sitting in AOL chat rooms listening to the paid operatives. At times, they even talk to each other about what they're doing. Whose opinion do the polls reflect? Pollsters are having real problems gauging public opinion since so few now use land lines vs cells. (Do you know ANYONE who still uses AOL??? Most have DSL or cable...)

Re international affairs/security issues: I think for once that the Daily Show has nailed the race: "RESTORING HONOR AND DIGNITY TO THE WHITE HOUSE." Does Palin help on that score?

"community organizer" - Obama was hired right out of college by 8 Catholic parishes where the budget went from nearly nothing to over $400,000. He was in Crain's Chicago Business as one of the young people to watch.

Rudy Giuliani's comments about Obama never running anything is nearly word for word what he said about McCain last year.

Palin is getting quite a lot of positive buzz, but most of what she says doesn't check out. The more I see, the more I wish he'd just run with his wife, Cindy, who I am really coming to admire...or Christine Todd Whitman, who actually has accomplishments.

Re #61 BigG Me thinks that what is "pouring in" is the "undressing" of "Silent Sarah" and her false facade. The "deluge" of GOP rhetorical spin absolving her of blatant, visual, obvious shortcomings has a lot of people wondering if the Republicans have created "Bull Moose Party II. This time it is really "bull" and produces only excrement that doesn't qualify as "fertilizer" except to place Republicans on a giant compost pile for segregation. "Alaskan Sarah" has been on "ice" for only a few years. It's time for the "thaw" and I bet she gets "roasted">

Sorry you missed me. Had the place painted and stayed out of their way.

canuck, thought you weren't going to comment on the US election.

Also, it has become apparent that another idiot has joined the forum under multiple aliases.

What an odd thing to do, especially when you use all caps and ROTFLMAO all day long like a true maniac.

You know, if it were Biden/Obama, it might make more sense because Obama has less experience than Palin.

The sad thing is that all the liberals can come up with to slam Palin is her consenting-adult-child's pregnancy.

Let's see, pregnant teen daughter vs.

- cop killing terrorists,
- Communist backers,
- don't want my daughters being punished with a baby,
- slumlord of my district buys me a house (oh, wait, that was the slumlord's wife who bought the property).

"More evidence, if any were needed, that Obama's past associations have defined him as a politician and that the more radicals that turn up in his background, the more we must question just what his beliefs truly are."

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2...

#44...InquisitiveJS..when challenged reply by calling names and insulting the person...normal behavior for which he previously was banned

read the "USER CONTENT" rules and pay particular attention to rule C (11) and after you manage to sound out the words read the following:

A) We reserve the right in our sole discretion and at any time to terminate or suspend your Membership and/or block your access to the Web site for any reason including, without limitation if you have failed to comply with the letter and spirit of these Terms of Use. You agree that Scripps shall not be liable to you or any third party for any termination or suspension of your Membership or for blocking your access to the Web site.

from NDN user content rules

pay particular attention to OUR SOLE DISCRETION!!

it is repeated throughout the rules

believe me if the ordinary poster had the authority to remove people this forum would have constantly changing posters

so if "say" you have an e-mail from someone at NDN contrary to their rules forward their name and I will contact to ask why the rule is different from those posted here......

or will you run away again like when you were challenged before

you really are a pathetic little man

Knital, Rejoice, Oldtimer and like are "big" on the "concept" that Republicans protect America better than Democrats. The GOP has that "theme" as one of their foremost planks in this election campaign.

You have to give them "credit" for putting their actions where their mouths are. They have arranged for missiles to be placed in Poland. (for our defense?) They have defied Russia by unconditionally supporting Georgia as a "bastion of Democracy" and committing us to their defense. Cheney goes to the Ukraine and promises more of the same version of GOP establishment democracy with NATO membership sponsorship from the U.S. All of these "maneuvers" are not to be construed as "intimidation" or "nation building" or anything but a political philosophical exercise with the goal of effecting "world peace and prosperity". Perhaps, the final touch should be to construct a moat around the Kremlin and establish an official seige? They won't wake up. I'm sure that all conservative Republicans can subscribe to that Bush/McCain/Cheney/Palin/Rove/Limbaugh/Hannity line of "logic".

Re #70 Perseauk First off, thank you for walking into my bailiwick. I have forgotten more about Chicago than you know of it. That includes the suburbs and collar counties. Love to compare notes and rip you apart piecemeal!

Now as for dealing with Islam terror! If you knew anything at all you would compare Japanese WWII` Banzai terror as an example of how fanaticism is dealt with intelligently. The Japs make Bin Ladin look like an amateur by comparison and we effectively silenced and contained their activities. Do some reading. (in a library, not on u-tube)

Safe for the last seven years is the biggest joke and lame brain GOP argument. One could say the attack on the trade center in 1993 and on 9/11/01 spanned nearly 8 years. What's that prove? You can only count when you think it favors your ignorance.

If the Republicans hadn't been so obssessed in dispensing the Clinton surplus to their menagerie of greedy political sponsors, they might have utilized government intelligence more resourcefully and contained or even prevented 9/11.

NEWS ALERT: Policy speech for seniors

"As President, these are the policies I will pursue so that older Americans can continue living the longer, better, more productive lives that they have every right to expect."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/arti...

gonefishin....tried to but Rejoice...oldtimer..and Inquisitive kept pulling me in by mocking my name in their posts..so I decided to join in the gunfight

please feel free to comment on our upcoming Federal election which will be called tomorrow and we will go to the polls on October 14th

quite civilized eh!!!!

Will Barry fire him? No, because he's not a man of his word.

"Howard Gutman, a member of the Obama campaign's National Finance Committee, directly and forcefully questioned the parenting of Gov. Sarah Palin:"

http://perfunction.typepad.com/perfun...

You know you right wing "groupies" keep beating the drums about Obama and his alledgedly corrupt association with left wing elements. It's been sort of a silly exposition of frustration on your part and I can't even think how it compares to the Keating fiasco, one of Viagara Johnny's "strong suits". Then there is Abramoff, a guy his own defense counsel describes as a "Jekyl & Hyde" personality. We could get into the Enron debacle and the Bush/McCain/Gramm ties that are just as close as the Obama insinuations. You guys in those glass houses really need to put the stones down and remember what Jesus said to Mary Magdalene. There is redemption for all "prostitutes".

The big difference elephant matter?

Rezko bought the bonehead a house.

Keep dreaming about your bailiwick.

Snork.

These are some of the reasons I won't vote for John McCain:

1. I believe in universal health care.

2. I believe we should never have invaded Iraq, and we should get out as soon as possible.

3. I believe we should spend more money helping people who need help and not take money away from programs that help people.

4. I believe in a better transportation system.

5. I believe we should spend more money to fix our infrastructure.

6. I'm against the National Rifle Association, for abortion rights, against school vouchers.

McCain is a social conservative. I'm a social liberal.

I believe that Obama is more in tune with my values. Obama is not perfect, but when we vote we vote for the person who we think will do the most good and do what we want done. McCain and Palin are social conservatives. I don't like their agenda.

I'm not voting for a person's personality or how good they can talk. I vote for what a candidate's party stands for. I believe in what the Democratic Party stands for more than the Republican Party.

#84 Rationalman I second the motion!

#83 Gonefishin What did Keating, Abramoff, Lay and the other "slime" buy? Do fish "snork", or do they just "jump"?

G, You believe Naples which is two to one Repub's and full of bible thumpers is a representation of our country?
Palin is doing a great job so far, in fact much better than McCain, but soner or later she will have to answer questions to support her rhetoric.

Rejoice, I know full well what you're saying about Iran getting nukes. The point is there is no proof that's what they're doing, and second, they are not stupid enough to use them if they did.

I believe with our being so bullying, bellicose and resistant to talking to anybody, the Iranians are feeling their back is against the wall. They know Israel has nukes, and they know Israel has taken out sites in Syria and Iraq without anyone saying a word.

Our imperialism only speads fear in these other nations, not knowing when they'll be our next victim because of some trumped up charge.

We've now alienated Russia along with much of the Middle East. Afghanistan is getting very upset with us, and Pakistan who does have nukes is also.

I believe as Ron Paul believes, that even if Iran got nukes, they could only use them in defense. We have a stand off now called MADD, and no nation wants to suffer the consequences of Nuclear War.

Barack Obama has as one of his goals the reduction in nuclear weapons. That is what we need. If all countries join in, then we'll see the threat diminish. Also, this administration has irritated North Korea so much, they too have re instituted their Nukes.

Also, thanks Elephant Tamer, we're on the same track. Under Clinton we were not attacked for 8 years until Bush didn't heed as he should have the warnings from the Cinton's Adminstration to be watchful. And notice under Clinton, we had no gigantic Home Land Security or all this spying we're now subjected to.

It almost seems this was a gift to Bush so they could do their imperialistic games and expand government, curb our rights and get the closest thing we've seen to a dictatorship.

The fact that eddie wants Obama is enough to vote against him.

And y'all should stop listening to Olbermann.

#86 InquisitiveJS....

"feel free to show my anywhere I mocked your name liar."

well pompous a** one doesn't have to go far back to prove my point.......

9/3/08......post at 11:15 am

9/2/08......post at 11:14 pm

both unsolicited posts that mock my name

"point and match!!!!"

you keep calling me a liar and I have asked you several time to show me where I have lied on these posts but you have slithered back under your rock and have not posted a thing to prove your accusations

you are still a pathetic little man with no integrity!!!!

# 90 - GoneFishin - I don't necessarily want Obama, but I like his agenda better than McCain's. In this election, we don't necessarily vote for who or what we want, but the persons shoved on us by the powers that be. Before the primaries, I was for Dennis Kucinich, but of course, he couldn't win, because he is too progressive. A really true progressive can't win in this country. Maybe someday.

Obama is better than McCain in my estimation. At least we have a chance for progress under Obama. McCain is an old conservative, and we won't see much progress under his rule.

I have my opionions, and you have yours. Just because I have different opinions doesn't mean that people should vote for McCain because I will vote for Obama. GoneFishin, you are insulting. And why do you tell people not to listen to Olbermann? We all have a right to listen to who we want. You don't sound very tolerant to me.

oldtimer....I would think the worry in that part of the world would be Syria

it has been reported they might have as many as 400 nuclear warheads.......and they have not signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty as has Iran

I still believe the Russians will keep the hothead mullahs in check and they will only use their nuclear capabilities for peaceful uses.......unless they are attacked

Jimboaw, I enjoyed your videos of the Daily Show. It shows hypocracy in action.

Also, I think we should get this pretty clear. No one is attacking Palin's daughter; we're attacking Palin. We're saying she should take another look at her abstinence only position. We see how, even in a family like hers, it doesn't work.

Also it was interesting to hear about McCain's hemming and hawing about contraception and prevention for STD's.

I'm very tolerant, eddie. I've read enough of your posts and letters to know you are far left. You also have no tolerance for people's religion. So, yes, people should vote against any candidate you would vote for. It's called a litmus test.

InquisitiveJS ...you are too dumb to see the end of your nose.....

using my name mockingly..."Canuck whining".... seems to me you are mocking me when I was not even posting you

you have mocked several people on this forum with your one word vocabulary..."whining"

in the same manner you can only respond by insults and calling people names

but I guess the readers here can form their own opinion while you put your own spin on the subject!!

you are still a pathetic little man!!!!

Jag, The NDN's is left wing??
There should be a standard for posting on this forum, maybe an IQ test would do. How about 90? Sorry rock head that leaves you out. All of the posters I listed would do just fine, Tag was the most intelligent, Fien the most educated, Fish is the most talented spin artist and liar.
/////////////////////////////////////
M, You don't see me posting how wonderfull Obama is because I really don't know how good or bad he would be as President.
I do know how bad McCain would be because he will be the same as Bush jr, he shows it by his actions-not his words.
At this time there is no real choice, we must vote for Obama to keep McBush from damaging our country and Americans for another four years. If Obama selects some of Clintons people to help him and follows most of Clintons economic and foreign policies, he will be a GREAT President.

Lets be clear about the Keating Five as it effects Senator McCain.

They all did not act like we expect our elected officials to act. Another example for the need of term limits.

The Senate Ethics Committee found:

Alan Cranston (D): severely reprimanded (he was a blatant thief

Donald Riegle (D)and Dennis DeConcini (D): criticized for acting improperly (they were thieves)

John Glenn (D) and John McCain (R): cleared of impropriety (they were stupid)

"You have the power to police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments. Flagged comments go directly to a staff member for review."

got that name yet???? or are you avoiding the question again??????

note is says goes to a staff member for review

still waiting for you to prove your other false accusations!!!!!!

Question, Why didn't Bristol Palin get married as soon as she found out she was pregnant?
Why not now?
How long will they wait?
Is her boy friend sure the baby is his?
When you promote/push/ use your moral religous agenda, then stonewall, don't answer questions or give an interview, questions like this get asked.

Well, it's easy to see that if a Right Winger, McCain (Keating associate), doesn't agree with one, one is automatically a Marxist. That's the easy way out for them, but it shows again how little they know.

Probably none of us who are on this blob who back Obama are Marxists. I know I'm not, nor all those other Republicans who aren't backing McCain. Ron Paul is probably the farthest thing you can get from a Marxist. So, try to think a little more deeply what we're dealing with here, and realize that most of this has nothing to do with Marxism.

I know I want freedom, and that means I don't want the government messing in my private life with my personal decisions about my health needs or anything. I don't want any Pentacostal religion especially running my life or my daughter's lives or my grand childrens' lives.

I was given a gift by women who went before me, and I don't want any bull dog with lip stick on to mess with it in any way.

Now, lets looks at the Bull Dog. I think from what I've heard the name fits her well, and McCain might just be one of her victims. In a way I feel a little sorry for the old guy. Sarah's used to having her own way and knocking people out who get in her way. Not a nice trait for anyone, well maybe for some back woodsman, but we do live in a civilized society and I do want our leaders to be civilized.

Here are a few tidbits I heard about Palin: She didn't sell that jet on e-bay for a profit like she boasted. It was sold by someone else in her administration at a loss. Well, there goes Sarah again, taking credit for things she didn't do.

And that bridge to nowhere that she was first for and then she was against; she got the money anyway but used it for other things. That was about 300 hundred and some million dollars. Some earmark.

Also, Sarah's personality as we're getting a taste of is stubborn and blunt. That'll go over like a ton of bricks in her V.P. job. That doesn't work well here in civilized land, but I heard the Alaskans like that because they consider themselves blunt and stubborn.

Also, she lied up a storm about Obama raising your taxes. She said that to a crowd of people in the bracket that Obama targets for tax reductions. Either she didn't know that or she's an outright liar, and I would think we're pretty tired of that lying business we've been putting up with for nearly 8 years.

#102....#105

"methinks he doth protest too much"

poetic license from Hamlet

Thank you Jag, Your #110 proved my point exactly.

Another thing, Sarah doesn't have any say over National Guardsmen who are called to duty in the Arms Service. So let's clear that up too.

So, stay tuned. There'll be more. And if she ever lets a reporter close to her, we might find out how little she knows.

So, her credentials for what she does know and handle are pretty slim. She's been pushing people around and firing them even if they don't deserve it.

If she's representative of womanhood, then we are truly in trouble. She has the manners of a grizzly bear, and is just as dangerous.

Inquisitive, you'd better look at your anger management. I can see why you were pulled. Of all the bloggers, you exude the worst anger. I know they are probably as upset as you, but they do show some modicum of control even though they can throw their share of insults. It's the feeling one gets from you that makes one wonder if one's computer will blow.

The fact that all the liberals can talk about is the child of a child shows that they don't listen to their man, who won't actually keep his word and fire someone for talking about someone's child's child.

How childish.

Truth, Sarah Palin isn't lieing now about Obama, she is just reading the script that she given from the McCain camp, she doesn't know which end is up right now.
But that's not true for McCain, he knows some of the things he says about Obama are false, that is lieing.

#116...what a weasel!!!
"Be deliberately ambiguous or unclear in order to mislead or withhold information"

when cornered to prove your lies weasel out of the question

still a pathetic little man with ABSOLUTELY NO INTEGRITY

and stuff that in your one word vocabulary

Jag, don't embarrass the conservatives by saying what you post is conservative, they do it enough on thier own.
What you post is just plain stupid.

Rejoice, you asked me what I felt would happen if Iran got nukes: Well, I want to ask you what do you think will happen if we invade Iran now?

Are we going to bomb them? Are we going to invade them on the ground? They've said they will fight back with all they have, and they have a lot more than Iraq had, and are a lot bigger, of course, Iraq had nothing, and it's taken the stuffing right out of us, and we're still there.

Or, maybe you think we should nuke them. And then what do you think will happen if we nuke a Middle Eastern Country and break the treaty? Do you think the other countries are going to just stand by and watch that? Or maybe, they're looking at the handwriting on the wall. The U.S. has become an imperialist gone completely bizerk and has to be stopped.

What can we gain out of any of that? Only our own disaster.

Also, I'm sure you've heard of Nuclear radiation. Well, Iran isn't the only country to be affected by radiation. What about our soldiers over there? What about the wind blowing westward right over Israel. What about the Saudi's and the few friends we have left there? And lastly what about our oil supply we count on so heavily?

Rejoice, invading Iraq is only disaster all the way around. That's why we need cooler minds. That's why Obama has the right approach. I believe he can talk to them; however, if he takes the bully approach we've been using, then all bets are off.

Obama has the intelligence, the insight, and the judgment. Those are things people can be years in Washington and don't get.

Also, Russia came to the rescue of the South Ossetians beseiged by the Georgians. It seems we came to the rescue of the Kosovars when we said they were beseiged by the Serbs. In both cases these provinces were part of either Georgia or Serbia. There is one difference though, the South Ossetians have never wanted to be a part of Georgia. They were pulled in when Georgia broke from the Soviet Union. But South Ossetians feel more of an affiliation with Russia than Georgia. The Kosovars were happily part of Serbia for hundered of years until they were inundated with Albanian immigrants. It was the Albanians who rebelled and fought Serbia for their independence.

Much of our problem lies in our inconsistency. Things are good when they fit what we want and bad when they don't. Russia knows that. We just underestimate too much the intelligence of other countries.

Thank you Algonquin for all the Info on Obama's accomplishments. Those are available if one looks, but the Right Wingers want to keep saying he did nothing. Those accomplishments have been listed again and again, but they don't want to see them.

Also, Obama has been on the Foreign Relations Committee nearly 4 years now. Sarah has absolutely no idea, hasn't even thought about other countries and our relationships.

And, I find it really humorous that McCain couldn't even think up his own campaign slogan. He had to steal Obama's slogan of "Change." You'd think McCain would be embarrassed that he couldn't even come up with one of his own. But wait, I think he did. I think it was "experience," but when experience didn't play well, they stold Obama's one of Change, because they could see Obama knew where it was at and they wanted to be copy cats.

Re #92 Perseauk -Wonderman you say. Absolutely!! You cite terror acts outside the USA between 1993 and 2001 as "proof" of your ignorant contention of continuing terror in the U.S. Nonsense! What in the world do you think was going on in Indonesia, Spain and England between 2001 and now? Has that just been more "stupid" GOP bluster? You can't see the trees for the forest.

As for Clinton not "knocking off" Bin Ladin presumptiously, is to deny the very principles this country stands for and you don't know, realize or respect. We don't kill or assasinate people! For Clinton to have assasinated Bin Ladin would have been a crime against our laws and beliefs. It seems Bush and his disciples, like you, have comprimised American principles for greedy self interests intent on securing power and control of government.

You say "my suburbs in Chicagoland didn't vote for Marxists like you". Was that DuPage County by chance? That "bastion" of Henry Hyde, the Christian hypocrite wife stealer's domain? Side note: I had the personal pleasure of insulting that ass to his face and he just cringed in guilt. He was a wife stealing gigolo degenerate!

Marxist, Communist are terms that guys like you like to use as labels. To you, they represent a "cop out" for a denial of real people interests. You imply the principles that promote "Big Money", "Big Business", Fascism and a return to an animal medieval society criteria. Your quest for the subjugation of the minority and underpriviledged is the very basis of your existence.

Wow, Al,
Has BO offered you a job or something? You post more than Barackobama.com.

RE $104 Bricklin Are you saying that McCain was exonerated because he was just "stupid", relative to the Keating fiasco? It seems he hasn't learned much in the interim!

Today on Fox News, Warren Buffet endorsed Obama for President.

Show time in Colorado Springs this afternoon had "Daddy Warbucks" looking worriedly over "Little Orphan Annie" extolling his exploits. It seemed like McCain was concerned that Palin might not spew out the RNC scripted rhetoric as intended. She did just "fine". She will make the grade as "loud mouth puppet" to its finest degree.

Viagara Johhny said he couldn't wait to introduce Sarah to Washington. I guess he really is counting on "cleaning up" on their "good fortune" ala Abramoff style. Republicans know how it is better to receive than give.

Re #144 Inquisitive - You are "short" as a lot of people on this blog contend. The jerk was saying that attacks occurred in the U.S. between 1993 & 2001 by contending that an embassy in foreign lands is U.S. territory (naive) and the U.S. Cole is an extension of the boardwalk off Atlantic City. (really naive)

Spelling: Hmmm! Compromise vs "arguEment"? Really! The meaning is what counts.

Proof of assassinations you ask. Maybe not, but at least it has always been our professed contention. Not everybody obeys the law, especially Bush Republicans.

Your label comparisons are childish and self defeating. You "boys" started it and now have to bear the consequences by association and guilt.

:Parenting" It's a wonderful quality in action.

The Republican campaign is "parenting" Silent Sarah" as she will travel with Viagara Johnny for "awhile" until she gets her "legs" settled. It wouldn't be fair to let her loose on her own to be exposed to the "biased" press and the onslaught of "unsympathetic" people who don't recognize Sarah's "intrinsic" qualities. She does very well reading prepared notes and she has a voice that would "wake up the dead". (I think that is the GOP base?) It's a plan!!!

#140

I didn't say.

But the stupidity belongs to voters who allow the Senate Ethics Committee to reprimand rather than kick the bums out and take their pensions.

When they are elected, voters place trust in their representative. If that trust is violated, they can no longer be trusted with the duties they were elected for.

Just turns around and bites him in the a** every time Elephanttamer

he seems to love that E slmost as much as he loves his "whine"

it's TRULY a shame!!!!!

but I will wait for him to post his proof of the lies he has put forward...got that name yet or are you having a hard time finding that e-mail???

avoid the issue much??? who's lieing now

not only a pathetic little man but a coward

lost that e-mail????

Canuck I recieved an email stating just the opposite. but thanks for contributing like the ignorant jack@$$ you are.
You whine more then a teenage girl... and your still a liar.
#44 Posted by InquisitiveJS on September 6, 2008 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest

let's have another spelling lesson

it's not "recieved"

it's "received"

i before the e except after c

what a pompous a**

WHERE'S THE E-MAIL??????

"And everyone of you have done nothing but put out lies and call names."
#151 Posted by InquisitiveJS on September 6, 2008 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal

and this is how the banned one responds...accuses everyone what he does day in and day out!!!!!!

WHERE'S THE E-MAIL!!!!

this is like shooting ducks on a pond exposing him for all to see!!!!!

Jag, It's time for you to start heading for your rock, you're beat-up, bleeding now and getting dumber by the minute. Take a long rest and come back again when the sky is blue again. Sometime around Jan. 20th, 2009. We will still all be here with our original names, you can change yours, but some how I believe we will still know it's you.

# 157...convenient short memory

but you really have to be stretching now to bring my faith in this

can you sink lower??

you are morally reprehensible!!!

#162.......enough said!

the banned one exposed for all to see!!

no substance ...no proof....no bal ls

no more from me....it's been so easy srtripping away his facade so the game is now boring

sorry...I said no more but have to respond

you were banned for your "personal attacks against others"

I believe the words repeatedly and consistently are in there also

so NDN BANNED YOU after complaints

the complainers did not bann you

your obnoxious posts got you banned

now that's all because this is so easy it now becomes boring!!!!

Canuck did not run off........just watching the rantings of a cornered and desparate paranoid man who BTW only posted part of the e-mail in #178 but showed it in closed captions as the complete e mail

you did manage to leave out ....."based on your personal attacks against others"

now joined by the resident racist Rejoice

don't they make a fine pair?????

don't twist the words InquisitiveJS.....I said you got banned because of your posts ...which BTW were a result of other's complaints...your posts were examined by NDN and deemed to be offensive...as you "repeatedly and consistently" posted such remarks

I guess the reason people you want banned are still here is that NDN did not find them in the same league as yours

now get over it...clean up your act...and play nice

Obama is a leader like those who are born once every 50 years in this country. From a list of great leaders