User profile: AARGGHHH
Joined: Feb. 8, 2007
Comments posted: 202
Contact AARGGHHH (log-in required)
Comments by AARGGHHH
Page 1 of 21 | Next
Posted on August 25 at 9:31 p.m.
Another thing that fascinates me... people who claim to believe in a 6,000 year old Universe have no problem quoting climactic data that goes back 400,000 years from ice cores.
What's with that?
Posted on August 25 at 9:26 p.m.
Rejoice #2:
I realize that little things like facts shouldn't get in the way of a good post, but NOAA might disagree with some of your facts:
Posted on August 24 at 8:42 p.m.
If you google swiftboat vets it's apparent that none of them were there either when Kerry did whatever he did to earn that medal and even his ex-C.O. is a little fuzzy when pushed. No wonder the term "swiftboating" has joined getting "borked" in the lexicon.
Posted on August 23 at 1:23 p.m.
Canuck... old friend... here's that article I mentioned about a week ago about the Pontifical Academy of Sciences:
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/sep/...
It should make those of us Catholics in the Science and Technology fields proud of our religion.
Rejoice... you might be interested in it too. Also those of you who think that the Universe is only 6,000 years old might remember this article when you claim that literal belief in Genesis is a "Christian" thing.
Posted on August 23 at 12:36 p.m.
Beware of what everyone on this site cites as "facts"... they reek of politics.
Posted on August 22 at 9:04 p.m.
Remember High School? There was always that clique that insisted on giving derisive nicknames to anyone they didn't agree with or that they envied. I guess some people never outgrow that cruelty.
P.S. I also guess no one wants to talk about Jesus, divorce and adultery... I don't blame them.
Posted on August 22 at 7:49 a.m.
It distills down to this... by Jesus' own definition, John McCain is and always will be an adulterer. Is it OK to vote for an Adulterer for President?
How many say yes? How many say no? How many would rather not answer for personal reasons?
Posted on August 22 at 6:15 a.m.
Heretic... Pro-divorce?
The same quote appears in Matthew 19.(Plain English)
3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?"
4 "Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,'[a] 5 and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate."
7 "Why then," they asked, "did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?"
8 Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery."
Remember...Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. Old Testament stuff. Are we New Testament believers in Jesus or Old Testament believers in Leviticus?
Never vote for an Adulterer.
Posted on August 21 at 10:06 p.m.
Luke 16:18 (King James Version)… in Jesus own words… “Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.”
Sen. John McCain (affair, divorce), former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (affair, divorce, affair, divorce), and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (divorce, affair, nasty divorce)... Reagan, Limbaugh, Dole, etc... the list is long... for every Democrat you can name there is at least one Republican.
Best to stay away from the topics of adultery and divorce like good Protestants and Catholics. Very few are able to cast the first stone.
Repent, you sinners.
Page 1 of 21 | Next
Posted on August 28 at 12:59 p.m.
Canuck and Rejoice... It's been shown historically that the biggest mistake is for politicians and theologians to talk science. Maybe theologians would like to define what life is before venturing into when it begins. Is a sperm alive and if it isn't human what is it and why? If your answer revolves around genetics, then are triploid humans human?
Canuck... I believe that Rejoice has no use for Catholics other than that she finds some of the conservative positions to be useful.
After reading that piece on the Vatican Academy of Sciences I'm sure you can see how people of good conscience can disagree.
On Letters to the editor: August 28, 2008